90% | of Californians live with air that threatens their health. |
9000 | Californians die prematurely each year because of air pollution. |
of the most air
polluted U.S. cities are in California. 7/10
|
years of your life may be lost due to living with unhealthy air.
1-3 |
billion are spent each year in California because of air pollution.
$28 |
Fresh news on the air you breathe,
from the Coalition for Clean Air
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
Coalition for Clean Air Sues Madera County Over Failure to Reduce Air Pollution and Traffic Impacts From Massive Development Project Coalition for Clean Air filed a lawsuit against the County of Madera in Superior Court to reverse its approval of the Tesoro Viejo project without having fully assessed air pollution impacts or providing adequate mitigation efforts as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Fresno, CA —Coalition for Clean Air yesterday joined in an ongoing legal battle with the County of Madera over its failure to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act in its recent re-approval of the Tesoro Viejo development project- a 1,585-acre suburban sprawl development located in rural southeast Madera County. Left with no other recourse, Coalition for Clean Air - representing the interests of concerned residents in the San Joaquin Valley and across the state - brought the lawsuit as part of its efforts to improve air quality in California and to discourage governmental agencies from sidestepping environmental laws in the future. Developers are legally required to identify and mitigate environmental impacts; however, this project fails to do that. “It is unjust that the County is not playing by the rules and our residents’ health and wallets suffer as a result” said Elizabeth Jonasson, the Coalition’s San Joaquin Valley campaign associate. She further remarked, “If this project is developed as currently planned, our smoggy Valley skies will just get darker and those unsuspecting 16,000 estimated residents, believing they are getting fresh country air, will be hoodwinked into higher rates of asthma and cardiovascular disease.” Originally intended to service the proposed University of California campus subsequently awarded to neighboring Merced, this massive mixed use development now stands to be a suburban hamlet for the neighboring fields of alfalfa, corn and grapes. Approximately 73% of the land in this area is categorized as important farmland by the United States Department of Agriculture. Without a thriving community nearby, most of the estimated 16,000 new residents will drive long distances each day to the suburban and urban centers of Madera and Fresno, 13 and nine miles respectively. “A poor EIR doesn’t just mean bad air quality we’ll be paying for, Valley taxpayers will also be subsidizing the infrastructure costs associated with the traffic increases and lack of water resources, which the EIR grossly underestimates. How can the Board of Supervisors require the developers to pay for road improvements or mitigate the lack of water if they aren’t fully informed on the extent of the problem?”, added Jonasson. As a result, this “dumb growth” development will severely worsen the entire region’s chronic air pollution problems and high rates of asthma hospitalization, particularly in children under age five. The San Joaquin Valley has been continually cited with the worst air in the nation and currently does not meet federal health standards for air quality; specifically in the pollution categories for ozone and PM2.5. This is not the first legal challenge to this development project. The Madera Oversight Coalition, Revive the San Joaquin, and the Dumna Tribal Council, representing local residents, successfully challenged the County’s certification of the developer’s EIR for the Project in 2008. As a result, the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s ordered the County to prepare a new legally-adequate EIR for the Project. While the County attempted to comply with the court order, the revised final EIR, certified by the Board in November 2012, misstates many of the Project’s impacts and fails to analyze others. Numerous state agencies, local agencies, environmental groups, and members of the public provided the Board of Supervisors with their expert assessment of the EIR and raised concerns about the Project’s suburban sprawl nature and its great impacts on local infrastructure, traffic, regional air quality, urban blight, and wildlife before the vote. Entities including Caltrans, State Water Resources Control Board, City of Fresno, Coalition for Clean Air, Sierra Club and other experts documented numerous flaws in the report such as a poorly conducted traffic impact assessment, nondisclosure of realistic air quality impacts, disregard of evidence of severe deficiencies in available water resources to support the proposed population, improper mitigation efforts, and failure to address deficiencies identified in the previous litigation. The legal inadequacies in the revised EIR are detailed in the Coalition’s filed Petition for Writ of Mandate with the Superior Court of California for the County of Madera. The Coalition for Clean Air seeks for the County to set aside and vacate its certification of the EIR and any permits and approvals of the Project based on the flawed EIR. In addition, it seeks a court order for the County to prepare and certify a legally adequate EIR for the Project so the potential significant health and environmental impacts are reasonably identify for the decision-makers and the public, and enable the formulation of realistic and feasible alternatives and mitigation measures to avoid those impacts. ### Established in 1971, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) is California’s only statewide organization exclusively advocating for healthy air. CCA is known for spearheading innovative air quality policies, such as the Smog Check program, ban on toxic dry cleaning chemicals, and incentive funding for alt fuels; all of which serve as nationwide standards. With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, CCA reduces air pollution and improves public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.ccair.org Coalition for Clean Air is represented by the law firm of Chatten-Brown and Carstens in this case.
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
Co‐Sponsor Statement on Governor Brown’s signing of bills to clean air and create jobs Sacramento, CA — Governor Brown signed into law a two‐bill package to establish a landmark framework to help cleanup our air and create jobs through wise investments of cap‐and‐trade revenue. “Our poorest, most polluted communities will breathe easier thanks to these bills,” said Nidia Bautista, policy director atthe Coalition for Clean Air. “With climate change on the rise and high unemployment rates, our Governor today sent apowerful message that all Californians’ health and welfare matters. Governor Brown, Speaker Perez, and Senator deLeon deserve a big thank you for honoring commitments made to strengthen and protect all Californians. Within thispolicy framework, Californians who breathe the dirtiest air will soon see tangible, on‐the‐ground, green investments intheir communities to clean the air, provide jobs, and revitalize their communities.” About the bills: Senator Kevin de León (D‐Los Angeles), the author of SB 535, and co‐sponsored by Coalition for Clean Air, teamed upwith Assembly Speaker John Perez (D‐Los Angeles), who authored related bill, AB 1532, to pass a package of legislationto facilitate AB32 investment decision‐making. Setting the investment strategy and framework is the crucial first steptowards ramping up California’s clean energy economy, air quality improvements and the revitalization of the state’smost underserved communities. Potential investments include improved energy efficiency, solar and wind projects,transit improvements, low‐carbon freight transportation and urban greening across California. SB 535 resulted from more than four years of effort to ensure the realization of the requirements in California’s GlobalWarming Solutions Act (AB 32) to “direct investments to the most disadvantaged communities.” The bill requires aminimum of 10% of the investments from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund are located in the identifiedneighborhoods, with 25% of the investments required to demonstrate a benefit to these communities with the purposeto meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals. AB 1532, the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, authored by Assembly Speaker John Perez (D‐Los Angeles) establishesthe broad framework and process for investing AB 32 auction revenues. The measure ensures a public process,transparency, and accountability by requiring agencies to develop investment plans, host public hearings, provideannual reporting, and ensure active oversight roles by legislative budget committees. SB 535 is co‐sponsored by Coalition for Clean Air, the State Conference of the NAACP, the Greenlining Institute, EllaBaker Center, NRDC and Asian Pacific Environmental Network. The joint bill package is supported by a long list ofsupporters representing business, labor, environmental, social justice, health and many others, including the CaliforniaBlack Chamber of Commerce and Latin Business Association. ### Established in 1971, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) is California’s only statewide organization exclusively advocating for healthy air.CCA is known for spearheading innovative air quality policies, such as the Smog Check program, ban on toxic dry cleaning chemicals, and incentivefunding for alt fuels; all of which serve as nationwide standards. With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, CCA reduces air pollution andimproves public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.ccair.org
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
On the cusp of state’s first carbon auction, policy package to ensure transparency, accountability and equity in investment decisions clears legislative hurdles, now headed to governor’s desk Effort establishes a framework to help tackle climate crisis, facilitate clean energy economy, clean the air and establish landmark policy to ensure benefits to underserved communities
Sacramento, CA — As the clock ran out on the 2012 legislative session, the California Legislature passed a two-bill package, that if signed by the Governor, will establish a landmark framework to help California meet its climate change goals by addressing investment decisions related to cap-and-trade auction revenue. With California scheduled to have its first carbon auction in November, Senator Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles), the author of SB 535, and co-sponsored by Coalition for Clean Air, teamed up with Assembly Speaker John Perez (D-Los Angeles), who authored a related bill, AB 1532, to pass a package of legislation designed to help tackle the climate crisis, facilitate California's clean energy economy, improve air quality and benefit the state’s most underserved communities. Both bills will need to be signed by the Governor before October 1 for either to take effect. Assembly bill 1532, the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, authored by Assembly Speaker John Perez (D-Los Angeles) establishes the broad framework and process for decision-making related to investing AB 32 auction revenues. The measure ensures a public process, transparency, and accountability by requiring agencies to develop investment plans, host public hearings, provide annual reporting, and ensure active oversight roles by legislative budget committees. SB 535, authored by State Senator Kevin de Leon (D- Los Angeles) is a four plus years effort to ensure the requirement of California’s Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) to “direct investments to the most disadvantaged communities” is realized. The bill is co-sponsored by Coalition for Clean Air, the State Conference of the NAACP, the Greenlining Institute, Ella Baker Center, NRDC and Asian Pacific Environmental Network. The bill requires the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to identify the most impacted and disadvantaged communities via a public process. SB 535 ensures that a minimum of 10% of the investments from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund are located in the identified neighborhoods, with 25% of the investments needing to demonstrate a benefit to these communities, all within the purposes of meeting our greenhouse gas reduction goals. While neither bill prescribes specific expenditures of projects and programs, if signed into law, the two bill package will facilitate decision-making regarding investments for a range of possible projects and programs within the parameters of reducing greenhouse gases, including improved energy efficiency, transit improvements, low-carbon freight transportation and urban greening to improve water efficiency. Supporters hope to maximize improvements in local air quality conditions through projects designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while also reducing smog and exposure to toxic air pollutants particularly in communities already burdened with some of the highest pollution levels. With mounting evidence and science on the expected impacts of climate change on California, this policy framework is timely and necessary now. ### The Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) has been dedicated to making sure that every breath you take is a breath of clean air since 1971. With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, CCA reduces air pollution and improves public health in California through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.ccair.org.
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
SoCal Port Area to Develop Zero-Emission Truck RoutePilot project to use electric power technology on high-volume freight corridor Los Angeles, CA—The Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) celebrated today as the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)—the regional planning agency for the Los Angeles region—approved a plan that will significantly reduce air pollution at the San Pedro Bay ports and protect public health. The plan calls for the deployment of zero-emission trucks along the Terminal Island Freeway and connecting routes at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. The pilot project will begin in 2013 and, if successful, will form the basis for an ongoing zero-emission freight route, to roll out in 2015. CCA has spent much of the past 10 years supporting plans and policies that reduce port air pollution and protect the health of nearby community members. “SCAG acted boldly today,” said Luis Cabrales, CCA’s deputy director of campaigns. “We’re encouraged that SCAG shares our vision of a zero-emission future in Southern California.” The Near-Term Zero-Emission Technology Demonstration and Initial Deployment project will demonstrate and initially deploy “wayside” technology, providing power to the scores of heavy-duty vehicles transporting goods around the area. This proven technology has already been used for decades to power electric buses, mining trucks and rail systems. In combination with other zero-emission technologies, wayside power can provide flexibility, range and compatibility with current operations. The Terminal Island Freeway is an important and ideal venue to demonstrate this technology. It serves as a transport corridor for high volumes of freight, causing a substantial air pollution impact on nearby communities. With shipping volumes increasing and new infrastructure being developed, CCA views this is as a timely opportunity to invest responsibly. “We can’t afford to wait. The economy is rebounding, and port traffic is growing,” added Cabrales. “We must protect local neighborhoods and transition to cleaner technologies now.” CCA worked side-by-side with NRDC, the South Coast Air Quality Management District and SCAG to bolster the RTP. CCA focused on the freight transport plan to lock in more aggressive air pollution reduction strategies. The plan language negotiated by CCA calls for cleaning up existing freight corridors, adopting efficiency strategies, and using lower-emission technology that is already available. ### With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. We are dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.ccair.org. |
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
San Pedro Community Protests Railyard ProjectEnvironmental, health and economy experts join port-area residents to testify against plans San Pedro, CA—Community members and environment and health advocates gathered this morning to officially voice their concerns about the Southern California International Gateway (SCIG) project. If built as proposed by the Port of Los Angeles (POLA), the 153-acre railyard will be the largest of its kind in the country. Officials at POLA and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railway have touted the project as a path to improving air quality while creating jobs; but experts predict the opposite effect. The railyard’s opponents—including the Coalition for Clean Air, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice, and Coalition for a Safe Environment—argue that the draft environmental impact report (EIR) ignores more than 30 studies showing lung cancer in workers exposed to diesel exhaust. The Long Beach Unified School District Board of Education opposed the EIR, saying that the port has failed to analyze the railyard’s impacts on the public schools situated just a few hundred yards away. “As the proposal stands now, this railyard is going to increase pollution, noise and traffic in multiple areas, including Long Beach, Carson and Wilmington,” said Luis Cabrales, deputy director of campaigns at the Coalition for Clean Air. “Many of those who will be impacted live in low-income communities that already bear those heavy burdens.” “If this project is built, the residents…will suffer negative health and quality-of-life impacts for decades," said Long Beach resident and environmental justice advocate Elena Rodriguez. Long Beach City Council has asked POLA to clarify various concerns, including inaccuracies, the lack of plans for zero-emission technologies, and a disregard for the potential job loss from relocating businesses. “We are concerned that the SCIG will cost more jobs to the local economy than the project will ever create,” said Dwight Robinson, vice president of the Los Angeles Harbor Grain Terminal, which ships agricultural products from California to consumers all over Asia. “Our company provides a service that only one or two other companies in the West Coast provide, yet SCIG plans do not include us in the picture,” he added. ### With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. We are dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.ccair.org. |
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
California in the Driver’s Seat with New Clean Car Standards Los Angeles, CA—Boosting California’s leadership role in setting the bar for cleaner vehicles, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) today adopted a strong suite of new regulations for vehicles model years 2017 and beyond. The ARB developed California vehicle greenhouse gas (GHGs) and smog-forming pollution standards that would harmonize with federal ones, which they are simultaneously working with federal agencies to develop. The state has also been updating its pioneering Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program and a rule to ensure ZEV fueling infrastructure. These standards are expected to help clean up the air, reduce GHGs, and save consumers about $4,000 over the life of the vehicle. “Today is the kind of day we envisioned in 2002 when we co-sponsored AB 1493, the Pavley bill, which established the nation’s first clean car standards,” said Dr. Joseph K. Lyou, president and CEO of Coalition for Clean Air. That bill, known as California’s Clean Cars Law, led the way for the Obama administration’s 2010 fuel standards for cars and trucks from 2012 to 2016. “We applaud the Air Board for developing regulations that will put California—and the rest of the country—on a path to achieve clean air and help prevent climate change,” added Lyou. “While the proposed regulations aren’t perfect, they still merit a ‘bravo.’” Today’s historic action sets the course for creation of advanced vehicle technology, cut air pollution and save consumer dollars. ### With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. We are dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.ccair.org. |
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
Valley doctor appointed to regional, state air boards Fresno, CA—Governor Brown and California Air Resources Board (ARB) Chairman Mary Nichols have officially announced the appointment of Alexander Sherriffs, M.D., as a board member of both the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) and the ARB. A longtime family physician and Valley resident since 1978, Dr. Sherriffs serves the small, primarily Hispanic community of Fowler. And as a founding member of the Fresno-Madera Medical Society’s air quality group, he has been actively engaged in promoting healthy air. “Dr. Sherriffs has seen first-hand the effects of air pollution on his patients’ health,” said Elizabeth Jonasson, campaign/outreach associate in the Fresno office of the Coalition for Clean Air. “His knowledge and experience will be a valuable asset on both air boards, which are crucial in ensuring public health in the Valley and throughout California.” This appointment is the culmination of months of work by a diverse group of stakeholders. Dr. Sherriffs will start serving immediately at the monthly meetings of each board. His responsibilities include reviewing draft regulation, consulting with staff and the community, and ensuring proposed rules meet the requirements to clean the air of the Valley and the state. State senate confirmation is pending. ### With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. We are dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.coalitionforcleanair.org. |
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
Hundreds of port workers, residents speak out against rail project Wilmington, CA—Hundreds of workers, community members, and environment and health advocates gathered last night to protest plans to build an intermodal railyard next to homes, schools and parks in west Long Beach. Proposed by the Port of Los Angeles (POLA), the Southern California International Gateway (SCIG) project. the 153-acre Southern California International Gateway (SCIG) project “It’s a disastrous choice of location—just a few hundred feet from where families live and kids go to school,” said Luis Cabrales, deputy director of campaigns at the Coalition for Clean Air. “Moreover, the project does not include plans for on-dock rail, emerging zero-emission technologies, or other modernizations that would help reduce emissions and create green tech jobs.” “If this project is built, the community will suffer negative health and quality-of-life impacts for decades," said Long Beach resident and transportation advocate Ryan Wiggins. "With the economic slowdown, this project won't be needed for many years. We can take this opportunity to avoid the mistakes of the past and make a plan to invest in technologies that will improve our health, create jobs, and ensure our ability to compete in the 21st-century economy." Touted as a “path to create jobs while improving air quality” by POLA, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railway, and union officials, this project will in fact eliminate more jobs, emit more air pollution, and create more truck and vehicle traffic than already exists in the area. “In order to create jobs, the SCIG will first put several thousand people, including several hundred local residents, out of work,” said Dwight Robinson, vice president of Los Angeles Harbor Grain Terminal. “Our company provides a service that only one or two other companies in the West Coast provide, yet SCIG plans do not include us in the picture.” BNSF, the corporation that will operate the SCIG, argues it will clean up the air by replacing an existing truck yard, eliminating truck trips on the I-710 freeway and investing in green technology. But local residents, experts and health advocates disagree with the company’s claims and the assessments in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared by POLA staff. “The report does not take into account the millions of truck trips through these streets,” said Jesse Marquez, founder and executive director of Coalition for a Safe Environment, and a lifetime Wilmington resident. “And by its own reports, BNSF’s abandoned railroad operations have left more than 250 alleged contaminated sites around the country; this company cannot be trusted.” ###
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
Metro Board Votes for Renewable Energy Policy
Metro uses approximately $26 million in electricity each year. “With this policy, Metro is on a clean and smart road to renewable energy. It will be good for the environment and the bottom line,” said Martin Schlageter, campaign director for the Coalition for Clean Air (CCA). CCA worked closely with Move LA and the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies, among others, to help shape this policy. The policy was initiated by a motion made earlier this year by Los Angeles County Supervisor and Metro board member Mark Ridley-Thomas, who said: Metro provides improved mobility to our community, and we can do so cleanly and sustainably. It is only natural, then, for Metro to lead in developing renewable energy sources. Metro can maximize the use of its many tracks, stations and facility locations and make the most of its dollars by exploring solar, wind and even train and bus braking energy as new sources of electric power. With the cost of electricity rising, Metro has developed a plan for energy conservation on its facilities. Now it can explore the potential for renewable energy on some of its 2,000 properties. View the policy (1.1 Mb PDF) At the 2011 California Air Quality Awards, CCA honored Metro for successfully becoming the first major transit agency in the world to operate entirely on clean-fuel buses. For more on Metro’s sustainability efforts, visit http://www.metro.net/projects/metro-environmental
|
|
TAKE ACTION
Don't be left waiting to inhale! Contact the White House NOW and tell President Obama: Don't stick our children with the dirty air created by big polluters—issue the new smog standards you promised!
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
|
Obama Decision to Abandon the Adoption of New National Smog Standards Is Bad for Public Health and the Green Economy Los Angeles, CA—The Coalition for Clean Air today challenged President Barack Obama to reconsider his decision to abandon the adoption of new, more protective national smog standards. Obama, who made the announcement today, officially reneged on a promise by Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson to have the new standards adopted by July 2011. The following is a statement from Dr. Joseph Lyou, President and CEO of the Coalition for Clean Air, a public interest group fighting for clean air in California. We must not let the fear mongering of polluters triumph over science and the law. The Administration’s own economic analysis shows that new smog standards will save lives, clean our air and save billions more than they cost.1 It comes down to a question of who pays—our children, grandparents, asthmatics and those living in our most polluted communities, or those responsible for creating the pollution in the first place. Driven in large part by the demand for clean air, clean energy and green technology are among the fastest growing segments of our economy. The delay in adopting new smog standards creates enormous uncertainty for those who invest in our green economy. Punting a decision until 2013 extends the unemployment line instead of expanding green jobs, just as we begin shifting to a healthier and more environmentally and economically sustainable future. The US EPA recently found that the Clean Air Act will save nearly $2 trillion between 1990 and 2020.2 President Obama should stop flaunting the Clean Air Act, reverse course and issue the new smog standards as promised. > ### With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. CCA is dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education. 1. See http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/s1-supplemental_analysis_full.pdf |
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 29, 2011
Contact:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
: Cell (562) 237-1433
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
: Office (213) 630-1192 x105
Coalition for Clean Air Applauds Obama Administration Announcement on Advanced Car Emission Standard
Washington, DC—The Obama Administration, working with the State of California and automakers, announced a historic agreement today on a framework to reduce emissions from the next generation of vehicles. The federal agreement will result in better fuel economy and reduced emissions from new cars and light-duty trucks, model years 2017-2025, specifically achieving a vehicle carbon pollution standard of 54.5 miles per gallon.1 This standard would help cut California’s oil consumption by as much as 180,000 barrels per day by 2030,2 equivalent to roughly a quarter of California’s 2010 crude oil consumption.
The announcement comes on the heels of a statewide poll by the Public Policy Institute of California, showing overwhelming support—81 percent of Californians—for requiring automakers to reduce emissions from new cars and trucks. In addition to the agreement on the national carbon pollution and fuel economy rules, California will propose in November the next round of Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) standards. These will put the most advanced technology plug-in and hydrogen fuel cell cars on our roads, giving California the technologies we need to meet our long-term air pollution and climate change goals.
Statement of CCA Policy Director Nidia Bautista:
CCA applauds the Obama Administration and the California Air Resources Board for their efforts on this historic agreement with automakers. As an original author of the Pavley law that required the first-ever reductions of greenhouse gases from new cars, CCA is pleased to see the federal government take strong action. CCA will continue to push so that Californians receive the clean air they deserve; that’s why we’ll be urging California to continue to lead the way and press ahead with adopting a strong clean cars program.
###
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. CCA is dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education.
1. According to analysis by Union of Concerned Scientists and NRDC, assuming 20.7 gallons per mile A/C credit by 2021.
2. 2.8 billion barrels per year
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 27, 2011
Contact:
Deputy Director of Campaigns
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, cell (562) 858-5596
Communications Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, (213) 223-6870
Los Angeles, CA—Shipping Clean, Growing Green: How companies are earning more by polluting less at California ports, a study on the economic benefits of clean air policies, was released today by the Coalition for Clean Air (CCA). This report illustrates how regulations to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) have created a market for technologies, innovation and growth in the port and freight transport sector.
“Clean air policies such as AB 32 create jobs and allow new markets to emerge and thrive,” said co-author and CCA Deputy Director of Campaigns Luis Cabrales, who recently presented the report’s findings at a White House roundtable during National Transportation Week. “California’s largest ports—Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland—have each promised plans to clean up global warming pollution, but they have yet to deliver.”
Among the clean-tech case studies featured in Shipping Clean, Growing Green:
This industry was hit hard by the economic recession, but growth is rapidly returning. Shipping lanes are again filling up, and cargo traffic is rising. As the economic engine of port trade returns to full speed, it must run on clean fuel to ensure long-term environmental benefits, economic stability and security.
Los Angeles Councilwoman Janice Hahn, whose district includes the largest port in the nation, wrote in the study’s foreword: “We must ensure [port] growth is sustainable. Indeed, we fail to clean up port operations at our own risk.”
Freight transport accounts for nearly 10 percent of the country’s GHG emissions, and in turn, the climate crisis and rising sea levels threaten our port economies. Studies show that climate change is altering the frequency, intensity and incidence of weather events, such as heat waves, winter storms and hurricanes, which will impact transportation infrastructure.
Solutions to our climate crisis are available today, and the regulatory foundation is already being formed. Private companies and government agencies must work in concert to reduce the impacts of climate change and boost the economy. Investment in this vision will pay dividends—not only in reduced fuel consumption and improved efficiency, but also in jobs created and lives saved.
Read the Executive Summary and download the report
###
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. CCA is dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education.

Senator De León Sets Sights on Cleaning-up California’s Most Polluted Neighborhoods
“Many Californians are still unjustly burdened by harmful air quality and chronic respiratory illness simply because of their neighborhood,” stated De León. “Monies set aside in the Healthy Neighborhoods Fund will give access to health and environmental clean-up funds to our state’s most economically disadvantaged and most often polluted communities.”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 2, 2011
Contact:
Christine Cordero, Center for Environmental Health, 925-336-1584 (cell)
Communications Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, (213) 223-6870
Environmental and health groups join Teamsters against polluting project
Hazardous materials and pollution from VWR Trucking Center pose threats to health and the environment
Oakland, CA—The Center for Environmental Health (CEH), the Coalition for Clean Air, and the Association of Irritated Residents have joined the lawsuit filed by the Teamsters on December 29 against VWR, the city of Visalia and others, to hold the city and company accountable for meeting required environmental and safety rules relating to the planned construction of a 500,000 square foot distribution center in Visalia. The groups charge that the company and city are illegally proceeding with the massive project, which will create pollution that will impact the community. VWR, which is owned by the Chicago-based private equity firm Madison Dearborn, is a global laboratory supply company that provides researchers with a full range of lab equipment and materials, including hazardous chemicals.
“This massive facility will have serious health and environmental impacts, and should not go forward without a comprehensive assessment of the risks,” said Christine Cordero of CEH. “California needs real green jobs from companies that can demonstrate they care about the long-term health of local communities.” The amended complaint was filed yesterday in Tulare Superior Court.
Expert testimony presented to the city by a former EPA Senior Scientist notes that, when completed, the VWR warehouse will generate up to 5,000 truck trips daily, spewing massive amounts of diesel pollution, greenhouse gasses, and other emissions in residential neighborhoods, creating significant harmful impacts on air quality, traffic and noise. The testimony recommended an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) to assess the impacts of the emissions and the potential impacts resulting from accidental releases of chemical hazards.
The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District requires building development projects larger than 100,000 square feet to secure approvals for air emissions. But as noted in the original December 29 lawsuit, the company has not even applied for the required emission permits, and has not conducted an EIR. The plaintiffs allege that the VWR project violates California¹s clean air laws and the State’s Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
“The San Joaquin Valley already has some of the worst air in the country, due largely to our position as a diesel trucking corridor,” said Elizabeth Jonasson of the Coalition for Clean Air, which focuses much of its advocacy work in the Valley region. “We need smart planning that prevents air pollution, protects public health and provides clean, green jobs for our workers.”
In October 2010, the County of Tulare Resource Management Agency sent a letter to the City of Visalia asking Visalia to conduct CEQA review for the project to mitigate its significant traffic and air quality impacts and also asked the City to explain the project's failure to comply with Air District Rule 9510. In November 2010, CalTrans wrote to the City asking for a traffic impact study since the VWR project would have significant traffic impacts on State Route 99. In response, the city claimed the 500,000 square foot facility was a "ministerial" project, akin to a homeowner building a new backyard deck, and thus could not be regulated. In fact, the city municipal code allows the city to impose conditions to protect public health and welfare from the impacts of any industrial facility.
###
The Center for Environmental Health (CEH) has a fifteen-year track record of protecting communities from the health impacts of toxic pollution and toxic health threats to children and families. CEH also works with major industries and leaders in green business to promote healthier alternatives to toxic products and practices. Last year, the San Francisco Business Times bestowed its annual "Green Champion" award to CEH for its work to improve health and the environment in the Bay Area and beyond. www.ceh.org
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. CCA is dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.coalitionforcleanair.org.
Association of Irritated Residents (AIR) is an unincorporated association that advocates for air quality and environmental health in the San Joaquin Valley. Members reside throughout the San Joaquin Valley and provide comments and testimony to local and regional decisionmakers and enforces important measures to protect and improve San Joaquin Valley air quality.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 16, 2010
Contact:
Policy Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, cell (562) 237-1433
Communications Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, office (213) 630-1192 x105
Cap-and-trade includes some positive steps, but diesel amendments could be a setback if adopted
Sacramento, CA—Today the California Air Resources Board (CARB) voted to approve a cap-and-trade program, designed to address climate change by allowing polluters to buy and sell credits and offsets in a carbon market. The Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) is pleased with the inclusion of a component to help protect disproportionately impacted communities.
The regulation is adopted as part of implementing AB 32, California’s climate law, which requires reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In addition to allowing trading of emissions, the regulations allow polluting companies to purchase so-called “offsets” from others who have committed to reducing their GHG emissions. The offsets will likely occur far from the source of smog-forming and toxic air pollutant releases typically associated with GHG emissions, which has made the cap-and-trade regulation controversial for air quality advocates.
CCA’s focus in particular has been to ensure that opportunities to reduce localized air pollution are maximized as California tackles climate change, a requirement of AB 32 and an effort resoundingly supported by California voters with the defeat of Proposition 23 in November. To help mitigate the unbalanced impact that offsets and trading can have at a local level, CCA has worked with CARB to include a Community Benefits Fund in its plans. This will direct AB 32-related investments to the most polluted and disadvantaged neighborhoods across the state.
“We commend CARB for its inclusion of the Community Benefits Fund,” said Policy Director Nidia Bautista. “California needs to invest in its most polluted and disadvantaged neighborhoods, to reduce pollution, maximize energy efficiency and help residents cope with the climate crisis—all while providing green job opportunities and boosting the local economy.” Coalition for Clean Air will work with our legislative champions and colleagues to pursue legislation to make the Community Benefits Fund a reality.
Tomorrow CARB is expected to vote on a proposal that would dramatically roll back its own regulations on some of air pollution’s worst offenders: trucks, buses and other equipment that spew tons of sooty diesel exhaust into the air daily. The proposed actions include amending standards for reducing particulate matter from construction fleets, delaying compliance for existing standards by as many as 12 years, and eliminating requirements for new equipment filters that would have had immediate air quality benefits.
Each year in California, diesel exhaust leads to thousands of premature deaths and cases of cardiovascular and respiratory illness and hospital admissions, costing Californians tens of billions of dollars annually.
“Retreating on our diesel pollution regulations would affect millions of Californians,” said Elizabeth Jonasson, campaign and outreach associate in the San Joaquin Valley. “And the brunt of that would be felt by the low-income communities of color living near major highways, agricultural areas and industrial centers.”
“CCA has been vocal about the threats of these amendments,” added Bautista. “Either way, we will continue to hold air quality agencies accountable and push for future opportunities to improve public health and the air we breathe.”
###
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. CCA is dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 22, 2010
Contact:
Deputy Director of Campaigns
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, cell (562) 858- 5596
Communications Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, office (213) 630-1192 x105
The largest ports in the nation set new goals to reduce health risks
Bannings Landing, CA—Today the harbor commissioners of the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach jointly approved the 2010 update to the San Pedro Bay Ports Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP). The plan was originally adopted in 2006 to reduce harmful air pollution emissions from freight transportation activities through 2014.
While the Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) applauds this voluntary effort to reduce pollution, the goals set by the Ports are not aggressive enough. The plan heavily relies on incentives, voluntary measures and grant funding to motivate parties to use cleaner technology, as opposed to enforceable measures that come with consequences for missed goals.
“We are not entirely happy with this update," said Luis Cabrales, deputy director of campaigns. “The Coalition for Clean Air will continue working with its allies and partners to make sure the action plan has the desired effects and is not used by industry to avoid responsibility,” he added.
CCA supports efforts by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) to draft enforceable regulations on port-related pollution sources as a backstop to the Ports’ voluntary measures.
The significant health impacts from port pollution are well documented. In 2008 the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that every year, 3,700 Californians die prematurely due to pollution from ports and freight transportation.
###
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the nonprofit Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore clean air to California since 1971. We are dedicated to reducing emissions and improving public health through advocacy, outreach and education. For more information, visit www.coalitionforcleanair.org.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 18, 2010
Contact:
Deputy Director of Campaigns
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, cell (562) 858- 5596
Communications Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, office (213) 630-1192 x105
Many cleaning products used at home will be made safer and less polluting
Sacramento, CA—Today the California Air Resources Board (CARB) voted in favor of reducing the amount of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)—toxic, smog-forming emissions—from 11 different categories of consumer products, including common household cleaning products such as countertop sprays and window cleaners.
Three toxic chemicals, methylene chloride, perchloroethylene and trichloroethylene, are also now prohibited from use in several of the products included in this regulation.
“The Coalition for Clean Air applauds CARB for seizing the opportunity to set groundbreaking regulations that others can emulate throughout the nation,” said Luis Cabrales, deputy director of campaigns. “Precedent-setting regulations such as these will supply consumers with the safer products that they demand,” he added.
Although consumers may have difficulty drawing a connection between household cleaning products and smog, CARB has found that the cumulative use of these products by more than 39 million Californians results in significant emissions.
"Californians need and deserve cleaning products that are safer and better for the environment. This decision is a victory for our health and our children's health," said Coalition for Clean Air board member and actor Ed Begley, Jr.
When this regulation is fully implemented in 2014, the emissions benefit will be nearly seven tons per day of VOCs, or the equivalent of taking 500,000 cars off the road. These reductions are a crucial step toward attaining the national ambient air quality standard for ozone.
###
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore healthy air and clear skies to California for nearly 40 years. We provide technical expertise, promote broad-based community involvement and advocate responsible public policy.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 1, 2010
Contact:
Policy Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, cell (562) 237-1433
Communications Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, office (213) 630-1192 x105
State continues to pave the way for national environmental progress
Sacramento—Following up on President Obama’s May announcement of new
greenhouse gas (GHG) and fuel economy standards, today the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) jointly announced they will begin the process of developing tougher emission standards for cars and trucks built in model years 2017-25.
Building on the success of the first phase of the national program covering cars from model years 2012-16, this next round will offer manufacturers a variety of advanced technologies that will satisfy all federal and California standards, while ensuring a range of vehicle choices for consumers.
Passenger vehicles currently account for more than half of America’s transportation petroleum use and nearly 60 percent of all transportation-related GHG emissions. Following the lead set by California’s Clean Cars Law, which Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) originally co-sponsored, the new national program will work with California to curb GHG pollution and help combat climate change, while simultaneously saving consumers money and reducing America’s oil dependency.
“We applaud the Obama administration for taking historic and practical steps for our air, our health, consumer choice and energy security,” said CCA Policy Director Nidia Bautista, who was invited to attend the White House announcement earlier this year. “California has always helped pave the way for the nation in environmental policy, and we will continue to push for state and federal clean car standards that will provide the highest protections for human health and the environment.”
As part of Obama’s May directive, federal agencies coordinated with CARB to develop a technical assessment that will inform the rulemaking process. The resulting Notice of Intent released today assesses a potential national program for the 2025 model year and outlines next steps, including stakeholder meetings to determine the appropriate level of standards. The final proposal is expected within a year.
###
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore healthy air and clear skies to California for nearly 40 years. We provide technical expertise, promote broad-based community involvement and advocate responsible public policy.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 30, 2010
Contact:
Policy Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, cell (562) 237-1433
Communications Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
, office (213) 630-1192 x105
Vetoed bill would provide climate change protections for vulnerable CA communities
Sacramento—Today the governor has let California down: Mr. Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 1405, the California Climate Change Community Benefits Fund. The bill is designed to protect and benefit Californians who are the most susceptible to, and least able to combat, the expected impacts of climate change.
AB 1405 aimed to establish a climate protection fund to direct a portion of the revenues generated from California’s Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32). In adopting AB 32, the state committed not only to leading the country in greenhouse gas reductions, but also to benefitting low-income and minority communities. Regulators have yet to fulfill that commitment, failing to provide resources for environmentally burdened communities to protect themselves from climate change on a local level.
“Without a Community Benefits Fund to supplement our climate law, we are putting Californians―especially those who already breathe the dirtiest air―at an even greater risk,” said Nidia Bautista, policy director at the Coalition for Clean Air.
In vetoing, Mr. Schwarzenegger stated he is confident that regulators will “continue the important work of fashioning market-based mechanisms that will reduce the burden on California’s business community while still achieving our climate change reduction goals.”
Proponents of AB 1405 expect to work with the incoming administration to ensure the promises of AB 32 are fulfilled and include protections for California’s vulnerable communities.
“This fight isn't over,” adds Bautista. “AB 32 is meant to protect every Californian's right to breathe clean air while helping with our global battle against climate change. We're going to make sure that happens."
AB 1405 is supported by a broad coalition of environmental, labor, community and business supporters―including the NAACP, Union of Concerned Scientists and the American Lung Association. The opposition included the California Independent Petroleum Association and Western States Petroleum Association.
###
With offices in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Fresno, the Coalition for Clean Air has worked to restore healthy air and clear skies to California for nearly 40 years. We provide technical expertise, promote broad-based community involvement and advocate responsible public policy.
Our Work | Learn More | Get Involved | News Desk | About Us


